It extends the original put-call parity logic to markets involving forward contracts—efficiently providing investors with another robust tool for hedging and structuring portfolios. The difference is that at time T, the stock is not only worth S(T) but has paid out D(T) in dividends. Replication assumes one can enter into derivative transactions, which requires leverage (and capital costs to back this), and buying and selling entails transaction costs, notably the bid–ask spread. The relationship thus only holds exactly in an ideal frictionless market with unlimited liquidity. However, real world markets may be sufficiently liquid that the relationship is close to exact, most significantly FX markets in major currencies or major stock indices, in the absence of market turbulence.
In the above, we can see that the put-call parity equation is satisfied, as the prices of the call option, put option, underlying stock, and the present value of the strike price are in equilibrium. The equation shows no arbitrage chances are available because the relationship between the prices is balanced. Now assemble a portfolio by buying a call option C and selling a put option P of the same maturity T and strike K. Note the payoff of the latter portfolio is also S(T) – K at time T, since our share bought for S(t) will be worth S(T) and the borrowed bonds will be worth K. Put–call parity is a static replication, and thus requires minimal assumptions, of a forward contract. A protective put is like buying insurance for an asset you own, specifically a stock, to protect against a downside.
In both scenarios, the portfolios have identical values at expiration, confirming the put-call parity principle. However, it’s essential to note that, in reality, call options are not traded for free, and the cost of the option premium must be considered when implementing this strategy. This typically occurs when there is little extrinsic value, or time value, before expiration, or deep in-the-money options. We will derive the put-call parity relation by creating two portfolios with the same payoffs (static replication) and invoking the above principle (rational pricing).
Using the Pareto Principle (80/20 rule), I distilled the vast CFA syllabus into essential, easy-to-understand nuggets. I leaned into visual summaries and bite-sized learning sessions that worked around my busy coinmama exchange review schedule. This smarter approach helped me clear Levels II and III on my first attempts with significantly less stress.
After inputting the strike price of an option, the cost of the underlying instrument, time to expiration, risk-free rate, and volatility, this model will spit out the option’s fair market value. This means the put option is overpriced relative to the call option and the underlying stock. An arbitrageur could exploit this mispricing by selling the put option for $8, buying the call option for $3, and shorting the underlying stock at $50.
However, real-world factors like transaction costs, taxes, dividend risks, and liquidity constraints can cause option prices to deviate slightly from the theoretical values predicted by put-call parity. Empirical studies have found that while put-call parity generally holds in most markets, there can be brief periods of vantage fx disequilibrium, especially during times of high market volatility or illiquidity. Market makers and traders rely on put-call parity models to identify mispricing and maintain efficient markets. Sophisticated trading algorithms and pricing models use put-call parity as a fundamental building block. This also means most developed markets see few chances for trading on related arbitrage situations.
Put-call parity is a principle in options pricing that establishes the relationship between the prices of call and put options with the same strike price and expiration date. It states that the difference between the call and put option prices should be equal to the difference between the current stock price and the present value of the strike price. The concepts of put-call parity and put-call–forward parity form a crucial foundation in understanding and navigating the pricing and relationships of European options.
Now, let’s take the asset’s value from this formula and plug it into the protective put formula we discussed earlier with regular put-call parity. Join over 2 million professionals who advanced their finance careers with 365. Learn from instructors who have worked at Morgan Stanley, HSBC, PwC, and Coca-Cola and master accounting, financial analysis, investment banking, financial modeling, and more. If the corresponding option is not fairly priced, an arbitrage opportunity can occur. That a long call with cash is equivalent to a long put with asset is one meaning of put-call parity. Thus, the value of the firm is the value to the shareholders (represented by the call option c0) plus the value to debt holders (represented by the risk-free debt and a sold put option p0).
The table below shows that the payoff for a protective put with an asset and a synthetic protective put with a forward contract is the same when the put expires in and out of the money. Here, the risk-free bond has a par value equal to the forward price of F0 (T). This shows that the value of a call is the same as being short the stock and long a put. As you go through the study guide, keep this equation in mind when you see other similar looking graphs. To deepen your understanding of concepts like this and gain hands-on experience, consider joining the 365 Financial Analyst platform, where practical training meets expert instruction.
We can also compare the price of an actual instrument to its synthetic version. If the two prices are different, we can generate riskless profits by exploiting the mispricing. These equations allow us to replicate an instrument by using the other three instruments.
The investor buys a put option with an exercise price of X and a premium of p0. If the asset’s value increases at expiration, the investor lets the put option expire and keeps the asset. If the asset’s value decreases, the investor exercises the put option, selling the asset for X dollars. For assets that pay dividends, the expected dividend payments must be factored into the parity equation plus500 review because they affect the underlying asset’s price.
The amount of the risk-free asset is equal to the present value of the strike price, adjusted for the discount rate over the option’s lifetime. A fiduciary call comprises a call option and a zero-coupon bond, while a protective put combines a long-put option and the underlying asset. The term “protective” reflects the nature of this strategy—it limits downside risk by allowing the investor to sell the asset at the strike price, even if the market value drops.
Today, we’ll dive into the fascinating world of put-call parity and learn how it can be applied to pricing options. We’ll also explore protective puts and fiduciary calls, which form the basis of the put-call parity relationship. Put-call parity is most straightforward with European options because they can only be exercised at expiration. However, while American options can be exercised at any time before expiration, the put-call parity relationship still holds under certain conditions. However, if TCKR is trading at $20 per share, you will exercise the option, buy TCKR at $15, and break even since you paid $5 for the option. Any amount TCKR rises above $20 is pure profit, assuming there aren’t any transaction fees.
leave a comment